factor_scores
Factor scores driving the organization's overall risk score for a given date. Accepts Unix epoch milliseconds. The date must be within the last 365 days.
Response
Returns FactorScoresResponse
Arguments
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
scoring_date - Long! | The evaluation date in Unix epoch milliseconds. The timestamp must correspond to 00:00:00 UTC (the beginning of the day) for the requested date. |
QUERY
query RISK_SCORE {
RISK_SCORE {
factor_scores(scoring_date: "123456789") {
factor_groups {
grp_name
factor_name
score
peer_risk_score
category
weight
licensed
recommended_actions
}
scoring_date
}
}
}RESPONSE
{
"data": {
"RISK_SCORE": {
"factor_scores": {
"factor_groups": [
{
"grp_name": "Device Posture Not Used in Access Policy Rules",
"factor_name": "Device Posture Not Used in Access Policy Rules",
"score": 3.759,
"peer_risk_score": 2.628,
"category": "Lateral Propagation",
"weight": 3.759,
"licensed": false,
"recommended_actions": "[Implement device posture checks for 5 application segments. ]",
"include": true,
"notes": "-",
"factors": [
{
"grp_name": "Device Posture Not Used in Access Policy Rules",
"factor_name": "Device Posture Not Used in Access Policy Rules",
"score": 3.759,
"peer_risk_score": 2.628,
"category": "Lateral Propagation",
"weight": 3.759,
"licensed": false,
"recommended_actions": "[Implement device posture checks for 5 application segments. ]",
"include": true,
"notes": "-"
}
]
},
{
"grp_name": "DNS Security",
"factor_name": "DNS Security",
"score": 1.967,
"peer_risk_score": 2.187,
"category": "Compromise",
"weight": 3.799,
"licensed": true,
"recommended_actions": "[Investigate risks identified in DNS control policies configured and perform the corresponding remediations.]",
"include": true,
"notes": "-",
"factors": [
{
"grp_name": "DNS Security",
"factor_name": "Blocking Unknown DNS Traffic",
"score": 0.844,
"peer_risk_score": 0.611,
"category": "Compromise",
"weight": 0.844,
"licensed": true,
"recommended_actions": "[Transition to a 'Block' posture for unauthorized or high-risk DNS traffic categories.]",
"include": true,
"notes": "-"
},
{
"grp_name": "DNS Security",
"factor_name": "Blocking High Risk DNS Domain Category",
"score": 0.422,
"peer_risk_score": 0.254,
"category": "Compromise",
"weight": 0.422,
"licensed": true,
"recommended_actions": "[Enable the block rule for high risk DNS domain categories.]",
"include": true,
"notes": "-"
},
{
"grp_name": "DNS Security",
"factor_name": "Blocking Critical DNS Domain Category",
"score": 0.392,
"peer_risk_score": 0.456,
"category": "Compromise",
"weight": 0.844,
"licensed": true,
"recommended_actions": "[Enable the block rule for critical DNS domain categories.]",
"include": true,
"notes": "-"
}
]
},
{
"grp_name": "Risky SaaS Application Usage",
"factor_name": "Risky SaaS Application Usage",
"score": 2.857,
"peer_risk_score": 2.971,
"category": "Data Loss",
"weight": 2.857,
"licensed": true,
"recommended_actions": "[Investigate the business use case for access to risky SaaS applications and add Security Awareness training to the internal process.]",
"include": true,
"notes": "-",
"factors": [
{
"grp_name": "Risky SaaS Application Usage",
"factor_name": "Risky SaaS Application Usage",
"score": 2.857,
"peer_risk_score": 2.971,
"category": "Data Loss",
"weight": 2.857,
"licensed": true,
"recommended_actions": "[Investigate the business use case for access to risky SaaS applications and add Security Awareness training to the internal process.]",
"include": true,
"notes": "-"
}
]
}
],
"scoring_date": 1787898873
}
}
}
}